Free Energy

It is widely known in many circles, but not by mainstream, that ‘we’ being defined as the human race have the ability to harness free energy, the problem is the ‘we’ that knows this, does something about it in the way of suppressing these technologies, and so often the oil companies are buying up these technologies then never promoting them, and it is also well known that a fair few people do have a high accident rate in this field of creating free energy. Sometimes ‘they’ do resort to killing people over this. Perhaps this is one of the most suppressed things ever, Tesla, Nicolas Tesla originally created the technology for free energy, and it is well known that his lab was burned down. No coincidence. He created this over 70 years ago, and coincidently a lot of the technology of today is born out of Tesla technology and the most commonly used today is the Tesla coil in radios, but many would not have heard of Tesla, instead they hear only of Thomas Edison, who was in no way similar to the genius of Tesla.
We have these devices that output over 20 times the energy put in, its called a over unity device, these devices are even in use in Japan, because they were having trouble getting electricity in, although it is very hush hush. We have the technology to wirelessly transmit this energy and for it’s waste to be minimum and for there to be two way communication of it, whereas now, it goes from the grid to our homes, it is possible for it to go back to the grid.
This free energy is one of the biggest lies that they have suppressed. If the atmosphere is indeed being polluted, and is causing global warming (there is strong evidence that this is not the case, for a simplistic overview of what may be happening, our galaxy is moving, with us in the centre to a hot spot of activity in the universe) then the ozone layer can be better protected, but more than this, pretty much all the third world could be freed from poverty. Irrigation systems installed and food production put in place and even commerce could be stimulated in these countries, imagine transport that is pretty much free to run, train lines to deliver goods, source materials for housing and suchlike, the possibilities are endless.
However free energy will probably never become mainstream for a very long time, reasons including mainly a trillion dollar industry will crumble, oil barons will not be too happy, but it is not just about the money. People who control these oil assets also control the mass population, and the mass population in the developed world are dependent on oil and so by having this control of oil is a good asset for them to keep us all dependent on them. Should they want to they can pretty much close up shop, stop delivery of oil, and in turn the world would quite literally stand still, the world would be at a complete loss and will have no hand to play against the powers that be. Whereas if free energy was put into production and people had portable devices and suchlike a very different story would unfold, but in order for these devices to ever be in production, they would have to produce millions of them for it to become economically viable to produce them and to keep costs down, so this means that it is a all or nothing with free energy, and if they give us back the power to harness the power of nature, they will be at a loss at keeping us at bay should the world turn to chaos if they decide to play their hand at stopping us have electricity and transport.
Imagine a world that suddenly did not have electricity, no transport, no communication, they could quite literally round up whole cities and put them into prison camps without the other side of the country knowing about it for perhaps years. More on this prison camp scenario in another topic titled “Underground bases and associated problems/solutions” but it is well within the global elite’s power to orchestrate something like this with them having their finger in a lot of pies including the oil/electricity one.
And so what can be done, well lobbying for free energy might be effective, but when it comes to practicality, it’s probably too late to be venturing down this road now. Instead get vehicles converted to run off bio diesel and such things, there is even a device that can increase mpg by 5-10 using just water, and its very cheap. For communication, stockpile on radios, analogue ones, buy generators, buy solar panels, these can charge these radios, these things may well be needed in the future, but I suppose these idea’s warrant their own topic discussion, so head over to ‘2012 myth or fact and how to prepare for it’.
And so free energy could have saved us a lot of trouble, saved hundreds of millions of people in the third world, we could have had a Utopia of sorts for the whole of humanity, but we put our blind faith and obedience into our Governments and we have paid a heavy price for this trust. And we still have so much trust, where even big charitable organizations are not aware that free energy is available. The problem is that the cost of creating the units that utilize the free energy cost money, too much money to be economically viable and unless enough interest is vested in this then nothing will come of it. If the cost of the units that harness the energy can be brought down to something that will pay for itself after 10 years of use then we are surely onto something worth producing, but the cost of production at the moment is 10 times higher than that, not economically viable for our generation but if people are serious about giving their children and grandchildren a better life than ourselves, well what better way than to give them no electricity bills, and transport that is free!

After writing the above I have come across this link to a mainstream news story. The story behind the story, or the bottom line is Shell are not going to invest in free energy because they cannot make any money from it, how do you charge for air or water? whereas a bio-fuel is a physical product which they can then sell and continue making their billions/trillions. They do say however that honesty is the best policy and so it's amusing that they should admit that they are businessmen and it's not economically viable, albeit still as always morally bankrupt, luckily they do not need to find their way to the parking lot as they have the heliport to go to which then takes them to their private jets, no messing about. Time is money. And free energy promises are as good as out the window, they never were really on the table though, it's what is commonly known as getting the heat off you. Corporations are bankrupt on every level except the monetary one.

Update: I have found this link which proposes that electricity supplies could be threatened soon.