The Media and Manufacturing Consent

If we are to take it as a given that the mainstream media is controlled by the elite then we should never take anything at face value, that which we read, see or hear, not only should we take everything with a pinch of salt but we should pay very little mind to it all, especially what is on the TV, it’s one big distraction, the whole thing, nearly all entertainment and news is designed to distract us. And so it often makes me chuckle to myself when a free thinker or a researcher in conspiracy theories cites a mainstream news channel as their source of intel. For instance Alex Jones one of the main proponents in the conspiracy theory/fact debacle in one of his latest documentaries told of how the media lost contact with President Obama, and had no idea where he was at a certain time in his campaign, well of course they did! They all work for the same people remember! And so to cite mainstream news is a bit backward at times. Never take anything at face value, to assume is to be indifferent, to be indifferent as good as being dead. Only dead fish flow with the water and to take anything the news tells you (because it never is impartial, there is always an inflection in the voice and face of the news reader, and the language used is always shocking in the sense of it exaggerates the particular news story) at face value is to be gullible nearly beyond reparation.
It is no conspiracy that the news is tightly controlled for instance, you go along to the BBC and they will give you a tour and gladly brag that they supply two-thirds of the worlds ‘news’ then later on they imply that it is pretty much just one guy that gets to decide what is news and what is not, that is two thirds of the world’s news, a third of the population is roughly 2 billion, so using simplistic maths for arguments sake we could say that one guy pretty much controls the news for pretty much 4 billion of the world’s inhabitants, something so tightly controlled has surely got to be riddled with corruption. A lot of people will think that a lot of journalists freelance, yes they do, but they belong to a certain type of people, to get the jobs in the first place, they are products of the system and so nearly all will be conditioned to write about things that they believe sell’s, and so already a lot of the dross we read about is already dreamt up, stuff just keeps on getting regurgitated with regards to the news, the story behind the story is always the same, they just change the spin on it. Then you do get your free thinkers for sure, but they will not get these stories printed in mainstream, the editors will soon have their say, and so a lot of these free thinker’s stories end up being in ‘fringe publications’ that mainstream will not give a second’s glance towards, and this is a simplistic overview of what happens.
It is probably not widely known, but it is indeed known that in the UK, a Mr Rupert Murdock owns Sky TV, a major player in broadcasting in the UK, but he also owns around half of all the newspapers, tabloids and broadsheets, the most popular papers, The Sun and The Daily Mail are owned by him, so one can say that with there being lack of competition they can say whatever they want without too much recourse since they are rival papers owned by the same company! They are hardly going to slander each other when they have the same parent. Even when newspapers get sued and sue, it’s all a big game to them, they are not interested in news but selling idea’s. They plant seeds. They arouse anger, create dissonance, condone racism one day than the next day condemn it, it’s full of hypocrisy and exaggeration, the same story of the day will be exaggerated in a tabloid, played down in a broadsheet, they play to their particular audience, they know their sector of readers or watchers and so play to their demographic, whatever the agenda is, they will push it through the media.
The media always has been a tool for the elite, Rupert Murdock is the front man, he is the guy on paper, but he is just the squeaky clean front man for the elite’s laundering of their agenda’s. Thousands upon thousands of children go missing every year, but the media will pick up just one or two of these families and run with it like a soap drama almost to the point where it becomes a farce. What are they selling besides instilling fear into parents and children for that matter? Well the story behind the story is the one that matters to them, and the story is always the same, they want to have more control over people, invade peoples privacy, and so up security, justifying more CCTV camera’s, I.D cards/chips etc but they do it all in such a fashion that the idea is never given out by them through the media, instead they wait patiently for the ‘public’ to suggest it, whatever the solution they think is to a particular problem, and the solution is pretty much always as the elite had planned to begin with, but because it was the ‘public’s’ idea ;) all is good, the tinkering, tuning of the lifestyles of the masses is done very carefully, covertly, never blatant, always below the radar, never arousing suspicion. And this is how ‘they’ get to pass new ‘laws’ and suchlike, this is how they can continue atrocities around the world, this is how they can fund wars, and get rich off them, just like a certain Bush family got rich off being in bed with the Nazi’s during the second world war, this also reminds me of how Hollywood comes into the picture.
Hollywood is infiltrated by those in the know, some are the good guys and through film do get stuff out there, but it’s about discerning the dross from the nuggets. One reason they for instance give us films like Men In Black is to make a mockery of what really goes on, so although it is fiction, it’s based on strong foundations of some nuggets of intel, and so by making a complete farcical film they dumb down the masses into laughing at themselves for thinking such things, and people may cite back a statement like ‘just like in Men In Black’ :p and the answer to that is it is similar yes, but it really does get lost in translation when Hollywood put their spin on things sometimes because people have this idea that it ‘only happens in the movies’ when the truth is sometimes that it is based on real events and real witnesses to such, and a lot of the stuff that goes on in this world cannot be believed by mainstream thinking, you have to think outside of the box in order to get a hold of what those in the know are telling us and what they are trying to do.
Sometimes it is about throwing us off the scent, it’s sometimes about getting an idea to be accepted, sometimes its about exposing people without naming names. For instance the Inside Man film, giving away spoilers, was eventually about a guy who founded a bank off the backs of the Nazi’s in the war, he basically got rich off the Holocaust. Well a very similar thing happened in real life with a certain Bush family. And the joke nearing the end of the Inside Man was that by having dirt on someone made them your puppet almost who you could use from time to time, and so for Jodie Foster’s character’s silence in the matter she joked to the bank owner that Osama Bin Laden’s cousin needed a place in the USA and she was putting him down as a reference. There are a lot of these films that do not name name’s but expose real happenings, often masquerading as fiction but do contain a wealth of information into such things as the nature of consciousness, corrupt institutions/corporations, aliens, underground bases, mind control and a whole host of other things.
The main thing with the media though is never take anything at face value, never. Rather pay very little mind or no mind to whatever they are trying to sell you, and there is nearly always a story behind the story and there is always one underlying theme of them that never changes, fear, they nearly always provoke fear, this is no accident, sometimes it can be very hidden and not apparent whatsoever, but for instance when they talk of possible warding off agents for cancer, it irrevocably makes you think of cancer, a week never goes by without it being mentioned, and it is actually almost daily these days, no coincidence, it’s all about fear, it’s all about making you live in fear, fearful for yourself and loved ones and friends, but this fear is only exaggerated because they have sold you pretty much the idea that there is only one lifetime, and when you are in the dirt you become the dirt.
Well they have done a fantastic job of this lie, they have lied about the nature of consciousness to the point where a lot of people have no idea who they are. A lot of people only have a false identification with a name/body/lifestyle/possessions, whereas all these things are temporal, always have been always will be, and will never be you, even your beliefs and thoughts and memories are off base for your ability to define your true nature. For these fleeting things such as thoughts are the most temporal of all things and can never be used to define you, and the truth is nearly all your temporal beliefs and identification with them are all meaningless in reality. Your true nature of consciousness is beyond definition in words, it is that which cannot be named, cannot be told, and cannot even be known, it can only be perceived. In fact the idea that we only have one lifetime is so imprinted into the masses’ mind’s that it is perhaps the greatest media engineering feat ever to be started and it’s greatest achievement thus far by the media. This is perhaps the biggest lie that they have supported. Remember a certain Mr Orwell once said that the greatest lies are often told by omission and so the greatest lie by the media is perhaps the greatest truth you will learn, that you are consciousness, and your consciousness never ceases, the only thing that will cease in regards to consciousness is your personal identification with it, this is one of the blessings that awaits us as a race one day, when every seemingly separate soul has forgotten all but that which matters, we will have no need for a body anymore, what matters is up to you to find out though. What does not matter though is the media, the lies, the distractions and even more so the identification with it, most of it is useless dross and to take it at face value is a crime against yourself mainly, you are denying yourself the gifts you are capable of, and the blissful nature of these gifts. Explore inner space first, because it is extremely more vast and complex than the seen universe yet profoundly more simple once grasped.

Underground Bases and associated problems/solutions

This is one of the most controversial topic’s and one that has very little proof to back it up, if any, it has had whistleblowers that have appeared to have been a bit of a ‘crack pot’ most notably Phil Sneider, but the fact he was found dead soon after he disclosed all does tend to give him credence in what he was saying. Others have of course seen the odd base and strange phenomena surrounding them, there is even one commonly known in China, where locals are well aware of strange craft flying nearby and this particular base is guarded by all sides by military, then there is also the base often in mainstream, Area 51, which is also heavily guarded. These are just 2 of possibly over 350 underground bases, but when the word base is used, a fairly large number of these bases would be more accurately be described as underground cities. These are linked by vast underground tunnels, with high speed rail networks that can supposedly travel from anywhere in the world to the other side in a matter of a couple of hours. Extremely top secret. And they bore these tunnels out, or having been doing so with very high tech and sophisticated technology that can go through the earth at around 18 miles a day, and this technology does not leave any waste, instead it incinerates the earth completely and leaves behind glass like walls. (There is even a patent for such a machine in the mainstream) This is most definitely the stuff of sci-fi, but it’s no conjecture when I state that truth is always stranger than fiction. Hollywood recently depicted an Underground city scenario with the film ‘City of Ember’ and it is no accident this has come about now, more about how media influences the mass population in the topic ‘Media and manufacturing consent’.
These underground bases will utilize suppressed technologies and so will most probably be using free energy, because these bases/cities/tunnels are so secret they can utilize a lot of secret technology. However what gets stranger is that it is supposed that in the bases/cities there are a lot of hieroglyphics on the signs, and it is suggested aliens live among those humans that work/live there, some claiming that they have never seen them because they do not have access to the lower levers that they supposedly reside in, while others claim they have seen them, and in the case of Phil Sneider he claimed he was involved in a hi-tech gun fight with them at Dulce, he was supposedly at the coined ‘Dulce wars’ by ufologists and conspiracy theorists. Phil was missing part of his hand to back up this claim though.
So what are these underground cities for, well apparently for aliens to live there and for a possible future scenario, should the earth poles shift again (more in the 2012 topic) then underground will be safer than the surface. Those in the know will obviously have there place secured and these underground cities are so vast it is supposed that around a third of the worlds current population can live in them! However it is probably more likely to be a tenth of the world’s population and a third is a an exaggeration. And it is believed that some time in the future that these bases will become public knowledge and the mass population will probably be offered them, this is perhaps why in America it is well known that the authorities are building what appears to be mass prison camps all over the country. A lot of people will revolt since they will not get a place in these cities, but don’t make the assumption that these cities are a good thing and are for our survival, those that control them have always had more sinister agenda’s and so who knows what use you will be to them in an underground city, but I’m sure it won’t be very pleasant, but it will never be obvious, they have never been obvious, they have always operated below the radar (hence a lot of people disbelieve or have no idea that these factions in the world even exist).
Should this underground city scenario occur, you will be chipped probably straight away, your ‘money’ will be on this chip, and they will know where you are at any time and can turn your chip off so you have no money for food etc they have unbelievable uses with the use of these chips nano-technology can apparently even now be utilised as to effect peoples thinking, mess with their emotions, cause pain and there are a multitude of other wayward controls they can perpetrate over the person with the chip installed. What better way for them to keep everybody in line, and by making this chip mandatory, a pre-requisite for entry into the underground city, people will be given no choice but to have it installed should they want survival underground. However life although it will be very different, and the controls they will have over you will be more tightly interwoven into the fabric of daily life, it will be still quite similar to now, at least you will feel that way, you will have the illusion of freedom, which for some people is just as good as the real thing, ignorance can be bliss, this is a fact. And so it is after all is said and done it’s probably better to survive on the surface if you can survive the calamities, if living to you is more important than surviving.

Hemp/Cannabis

It is possible to grow hemp with less than 0.3% THC (the intoxicating part of the plant) and so the argument against not growing it because it can be used as a drug is already by this fact simply ludicrous and it is possible for this hemp to be put to a lot of different uses, including consumption (extremely good for the body), textiles, paper, a chipboard type material and a multitude of other uses, including making hemp oil, and it is believed that the diesel engine was originally designed to run off hemp oil. So already we have a renewable energy source for machinery and do not need to bleed the earth dry of the ancient fuel of oil, every time we burn some oil we are burning the past, it has taken hundreds of thousands of years for that oil to form and we burn it in a matter of seconds as if it was always there and always will be, for it won’t, but that matters not, we do not even need it at all.
Hemp has been used and was in use for hundreds of years before the fairly recent laws were passed, and they started in America, and one of the original reasons it was outlawed is because when the powers that be saw its use increase (the actual cannabis plant with a THC level that intoxicates) they sold the law under the lie that it increased crime and suchlike and they even used racism to sell the lie as well. Racism was an accepted protocol back then with a lot of segregation and suchlike, well to get the mass population’s consent (manufactured consent) the media sold the idea that it was bad for the black community because it would make a black man do such terrible things like look a white man in the eye. An absurd notion in today’s times, but true of then, but why on earth is this plant still illegal when the foundations of it’s illegality were based on such flimsy notions.
It is illegal because it helps facilitate free thinking, increases creativity and these traits lead to something the authorities do not want, a person who operates with more of his right hemisphere of his brain is dangerous to the authorities. He is likely to rebel from the status quo and is likely to question more, but in no way should this idea of rebellion be associated with a reactionary, he will go along with society and the authorities if they are right because sometimes they are, whereas the reactionary will be more likely to oppose all the time.
People who smoke cannabis are less likely to be violent or commit crimes when compared to excessive legal alcohol use. It is also well known that a lot of the music we listen to was written when under the influence of this plant and expression through art is one of the most positive outcomes of use of cannabis. Mainstream media will have you believe however that this plant is a drug, and can cause mental health issues, and they will often sell the idea that when someone becomes inflicted with mental health issues and then commit’s a serious crime, that the person was under the influence of cannabis, these may well be true statements, but the greatest lies are often told through omission, and so what ‘they’ will probably fail to mention is whatever else was in the persons system, maybe alcohol, maybe, cocaine or amphetamine, because sometimes these things will go hand in hand, often an argument used against the legalization. It is true that cannabis use can be used as a gateway ‘drug’ to harder drugs, but it’s only in a minority of situations when this occurs, as is the situation with regards to people who become afflicted with mental health problems, and so say for instance 1 in a 100 people who smoke cannabis end up using harder drugs, should that mean the other 99 people should suffer and not use it because of the minority, and the same with mental health issues, maybe 1 in a 100 people may have an adverse reaction, but then if cannabis makes some people have problems, then the best advice is that they stop smoking it, why should the other 99 people who not only enjoy this plant but also benefit from it have to stop smoking it too? They shouldn’t, but this plant will never be legal, but that does not mean that the common sense of those that police the public can not come into fruition, sure a lot of police will turn a blind eye, perhaps those that use it themselves are more likely to do this, but it should be more mainstream, more across the board. However police like any other institution will have their own set of conditioning going on, so it will be often impressed into the minds of police that cannabis is a bad thing and if they catch people with it, it will be a good thing for them (the police) and a bad thing for those caught with it, often, especially in the USA having very strong sentences for something that is perhaps extremely harmless on it’s own for personal use. And so it’s the police that need to become more aware than trying to get authorities to legalize it, the police should have the ability to question their beliefs (given them by their institutions) and find out from other sources what it’s really like and maybe find about the music artists they like and find out if they are known cannabis users, and ask themselves would they arrest their favourite singer and then have them locked away and then be denied a great next album of theirs.
However the cannabis debate plays out, the growing of crops with a low THC level should be pushed frantically, it is a renewable source and would help save the planet tremendously.

Free Energy

It is widely known in many circles, but not by mainstream, that ‘we’ being defined as the human race have the ability to harness free energy, the problem is the ‘we’ that knows this, does something about it in the way of suppressing these technologies, and so often the oil companies are buying up these technologies then never promoting them, and it is also well known that a fair few people do have a high accident rate in this field of creating free energy. Sometimes ‘they’ do resort to killing people over this. Perhaps this is one of the most suppressed things ever, Tesla, Nicolas Tesla originally created the technology for free energy, and it is well known that his lab was burned down. No coincidence. He created this over 70 years ago, and coincidently a lot of the technology of today is born out of Tesla technology and the most commonly used today is the Tesla coil in radios, but many would not have heard of Tesla, instead they hear only of Thomas Edison, who was in no way similar to the genius of Tesla.
We have these devices that output over 20 times the energy put in, its called a over unity device, these devices are even in use in Japan, because they were having trouble getting electricity in, although it is very hush hush. We have the technology to wirelessly transmit this energy and for it’s waste to be minimum and for there to be two way communication of it, whereas now, it goes from the grid to our homes, it is possible for it to go back to the grid.
This free energy is one of the biggest lies that they have suppressed. If the atmosphere is indeed being polluted, and is causing global warming (there is strong evidence that this is not the case, for a simplistic overview of what may be happening, our galaxy is moving, with us in the centre to a hot spot of activity in the universe) then the ozone layer can be better protected, but more than this, pretty much all the third world could be freed from poverty. Irrigation systems installed and food production put in place and even commerce could be stimulated in these countries, imagine transport that is pretty much free to run, train lines to deliver goods, source materials for housing and suchlike, the possibilities are endless.
However free energy will probably never become mainstream for a very long time, reasons including mainly a trillion dollar industry will crumble, oil barons will not be too happy, but it is not just about the money. People who control these oil assets also control the mass population, and the mass population in the developed world are dependent on oil and so by having this control of oil is a good asset for them to keep us all dependent on them. Should they want to they can pretty much close up shop, stop delivery of oil, and in turn the world would quite literally stand still, the world would be at a complete loss and will have no hand to play against the powers that be. Whereas if free energy was put into production and people had portable devices and suchlike a very different story would unfold, but in order for these devices to ever be in production, they would have to produce millions of them for it to become economically viable to produce them and to keep costs down, so this means that it is a all or nothing with free energy, and if they give us back the power to harness the power of nature, they will be at a loss at keeping us at bay should the world turn to chaos if they decide to play their hand at stopping us have electricity and transport.
Imagine a world that suddenly did not have electricity, no transport, no communication, they could quite literally round up whole cities and put them into prison camps without the other side of the country knowing about it for perhaps years. More on this prison camp scenario in another topic titled “Underground bases and associated problems/solutions” but it is well within the global elite’s power to orchestrate something like this with them having their finger in a lot of pies including the oil/electricity one.
And so what can be done, well lobbying for free energy might be effective, but when it comes to practicality, it’s probably too late to be venturing down this road now. Instead get vehicles converted to run off bio diesel and such things, there is even a device that can increase mpg by 5-10 using just water, and its very cheap. For communication, stockpile on radios, analogue ones, buy generators, buy solar panels, these can charge these radios, these things may well be needed in the future, but I suppose these idea’s warrant their own topic discussion, so head over to ‘2012 myth or fact and how to prepare for it’.
And so free energy could have saved us a lot of trouble, saved hundreds of millions of people in the third world, we could have had a Utopia of sorts for the whole of humanity, but we put our blind faith and obedience into our Governments and we have paid a heavy price for this trust. And we still have so much trust, where even big charitable organizations are not aware that free energy is available. The problem is that the cost of creating the units that utilize the free energy cost money, too much money to be economically viable and unless enough interest is vested in this then nothing will come of it. If the cost of the units that harness the energy can be brought down to something that will pay for itself after 10 years of use then we are surely onto something worth producing, but the cost of production at the moment is 10 times higher than that, not economically viable for our generation but if people are serious about giving their children and grandchildren a better life than ourselves, well what better way than to give them no electricity bills, and transport that is free!

After writing the above I have come across this link to a mainstream news story. The story behind the story, or the bottom line is Shell are not going to invest in free energy because they cannot make any money from it, how do you charge for air or water? whereas a bio-fuel is a physical product which they can then sell and continue making their billions/trillions. They do say however that honesty is the best policy and so it's amusing that they should admit that they are businessmen and it's not economically viable, albeit still as always morally bankrupt, luckily they do not need to find their way to the parking lot as they have the heliport to go to which then takes them to their private jets, no messing about. Time is money. And free energy promises are as good as out the window, they never were really on the table though, it's what is commonly known as getting the heat off you. Corporations are bankrupt on every level except the monetary one.

Update: I have found this link which proposes that electricity supplies could be threatened soon.

Introduction Into 'Pure Conjecture'

Everything presented here is pretty much conjecture, acquired from several different websites, documentaries, books, magazines, films and suchlike and assembled in such a fashion where a fair few of my own opinions will be thrown into the mix as introspection is needed as the key into discernment of the material. However just because a lot of the material cannot be proved does not in any way stray from the premise that conjecture can be fact. It is my aim to get out there my personal findings, and with careful discernment I will try to only discuss matters of importance for a broad spectrum of people. Two things should be mentioned in this introduction though, first and foremost, the idea that our Governments of the world are looking out for our interests is to me ludicrous, secondly governments, being corrupt, are working on the behalf of more crooked institutions, corporations, and a fairly large number of these corporations have their strings pulled by a few very powerful people, commonly called the global elite or illuminati. These two things are presented as facts, the rest is pure conjecture, that can be fact.
The layout of this will consist of a heading and a discussion into that topic, they are in no order and some topics will obviously be more important than others. However my appreciation goes out to those who have died for these causes, been persecuted, threatened and discredited beyond reparation. To those that endure harsh conditions and work tirelessly or for little reward to get this information out there into the public domain and to those that it has seemed that their efforts have been in vain. Nothing of value ever goes unnoticed, it may take several lifetimes for the insights to come into fruition but all will at some time see the light of day, and eventually be accepted, new paradigms will prevail, old dogma’s and outdated customs will soon give way to better ways and those that wish these things suppressed will one day see differently and so with great appreciation I present here my findings….